I’ve been involved with KUMO (and its sister restaurant HAMASAKU) from the outset. I was obviously concerned to read the above post from “Jason,” and immediately followed up with the managers at KUMO to try to understand and correct what went wrong that night.
At the outset, I think it’s important to know that I view the honest accounts that are posted on websites such as EaterLA to be valuable - the positive reviews can be a nice pat on the back, and the negative reviews can be a helpful way to learn about and correct problems about which we might otherwise be unaware. So we take the good with the bad and make the best of it.
After reading Jason’s post, we investigated his claims and found that certain things might be accurate. There were a few complaints about the hostess who was working that night, and that problem has since been corrected. In addition, there might have been issues with the reservation system when Jason called to make the reservation. At the time, the restaurant was not open for business and we had just installed the system and were still working out the kinks to get it functioning properly. It is disappointing to learn that we weren’t keeping a backup reservation book at that time, but that problem has also been corrected. Service issues and portion sizes are also issues that we are constantly monitoring and revising to improve everyone’s experience at KUMO.
However, after digging into Jason’s post, we found numerous errors and, disappointingly, some outright falsehoods. The average price of the items ordered by his party was $13, not anywhere close $20; the few items that were $20 or more were larger items that could have been shared by his entire party of five. Jason was not charged for the full price of the meal multiple times or even once; instead, he was charged only once for a portion of it. Further, there is no record of Jason following up with anyone at KUMO about the nonexistent credit card issue or any other aspect of his experience.
As I mentioned above, these blogs can be great for sharing dining experiences – good or bad – but they shouldn’t be treated as a forum to make defamatory statements with impunity, which is sadly the way Jason appears to be treating them. He seems to be going out of his way to damage the restaurant. Not only did he post twice on your website, but he posted a nearly identical review on another site. Sadly, we don’t have a phone number to contact him to discuss his post. If he had followed up with anyone, we would have a phone number (or some other way) to contact him. That said, we would welcome the opportunity to do so.
In the meantime, Jason should reconsider whether it is appropriate to use this forum in the way that he has chosen to use it. Upon further reflection, I hope that Jason will decide to revise his post to retract the defamatory statements he has made.